Posts Tagged ‘Animals’

Confessions of a Former PETA Member

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

When I was younger, and less informed, I used to take pride in identifying with the bizarre tactics of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.  I cringed at every issue of their magazine that I received, though, so filled with photos of tormented animals; I used to wonder why they sent those photos to those of us who already cared about animals–it was distressing. Obviously, it helped keep their coffers filled, because they continue doing so today.  The fist and paw of Animal Liberation Front seemed to exemplify the radical changes that needed to take place. Free the Animals! Then, I did not question their tactics; I thought they were radicals and felt the torment of animals required extreme measures to get the attention of people. They did make the news and did make people think; unfortunately, what most people thought was that animal rights people were not to be taken seriously.

Now you can count me as a Vegan against PETA. They have made so many missteps that I cannot consider them a positive force in the fight for the liberation of animals.  A few months back, I was more concerned with in-fighting, disagreements and lawsuits between animal protection groups; that was before I landed squarely in the middle of one of their squabbles.  I felt then that if anyone was doing anything positive for animals, then good for them; why would I take a stand against a group that was trying to help?  But what I learned changed my perspective and increased my understanding of the problems with the largest groups, such as PETA, who take in millions of dollars yet do not seem to make any progress towards freeing animals from their horrible position on this planet. While they may stop a bad practice here or there, undoubtedly several more, often worse practices crop up to replace them.  At the root, there is no respect for animals.

Here are the reasons I am disappointed in you, PETA:

  1. You use tacky tactics.  Sexism, sizism, celebrity, appearance: all are superficial and do not represent the horror of what you know is happening to animals. Who cares who the sexiest vegetarian over 50 is? Why is it important to disparage a full-bodied female on your billboards?  And nudity?  Is that really necessary, when the reality is so very serious? How does that elevate the dialogue to save other species? What is happening to animals is no joke and it is offensive that you make cartoons while the reality is a nightmare in full living color.
  2. You are dishonest.  People trust you to do the right thing for animals. They entrust their companion animals to you, thinking you will find them homes. Then you destroy them before you have even tried to place them and spend thousands of dollars on a freezer to contain all the dead bodies. Ms. Newkirk, you have your photo taken with dogs and cats, yet you are not working to find homes for animals. That is inherently dishonest, using the media to present a false sense of who you are and what you represent.
  3. You support some of the most egregious companies by owning stock in them, companies that torment and slaughter millions of animals. How could you?
  4. You partner with companies who show no conscience, who cause some of the worst suffering imaginable; yet you partner with them if they make some useless gesture towards animal “welfare.”  If you end up getting slaughtered, there is no welfare involved.
  5. You have a scary attitude towards rescue that ends in death.  You have charged other animal organizations of not providing adequately for the animals in their care, but you kill the animals entrusted to your care. How is that better?
  6. Your kill ratios are getting higher each year.  What are you doing with all your millions of dollars, if you do not respect the individual lives of animals? Ms. Newkirk, you have said that the kindest thing you can do for a homeless animal is to kill them. That is not kindness, it is psychopathology.  The kindest thing would be to provide them a home.
  7. You refuse challenges.  Adam Kochanowicz recently challenged you, Ms. Newkirk, in an open letter to debate with Gary L. Francione.  Mr. Francione, a Rutgers University professor, agreed to the debate.  There is now a petition circulating on Twitter to request the same of you.  Why have you refused to respond?
  8. You have become a destructive force.  You support the failed welfarist policies that do nothing to increase respect for animals. Indeed, you show very little respect for them yourself.  Not just the dogs and cats found half frozen and dead in dumpsters, but the fact that you do NOTHING to try to place the animals entrusted to you before you murder them.  They are innocent, loving, feeling beings and you never give them a fighting chance. While you may not be able to save them all, you could at least try. For $32 million a year, you could certainly try.  Your lack of will is fatal.

Your kill statistics from last year, 2008, show only 7 animals placed and nearly 2,000 killed.  That is lower than any neighboring shelter and a higher kill ratio than in any year in your past.  You have an income of over $30 million per year, yet most of us could do better than those odds working with a zero dollar budget and a home computer.  The news that two PETA workers killed dozens of animals within minutes of being surrendered was defended by you, Ms. Newkirk.  You supported the workers (possibly because they were following PETA policy?) stating that they did not cause suffering.  You seem to have a pathological concern that living animals are vulnerable and the safest way to protect them is to kill them.  Your group kills healthy, very young animals – a veterinarian performed an autopsy on one of the dogs found in a dumpster who had been killed and he was only a six month old puppy, a beautiful and perfectly healthy young dog that would have been easier than most to place. Nor did PETA keep these animals in shelter for six months, thirty days, a week, or a day – but only for minutes, before they were killed.

That is why I am a Vegan against PETA.  I am glad you do some good with your money; you should.  But you also cause harm. You give Animal Rights a certain bizarre reputation that is ill-deserved. Gary Francione, Roger Yates, Randy Sandberg, Elizabeth Collins, Adam Kochanowicz, Dan Cudahy and numerous others are Animal Rights people that do not behave in an adolescent fashion. They do not use the media and celebrities for questionable purposes.  The work ahead of us is far too important to have it reduced to a cartoon, to have insulting billboards spread out across our highways that offend a good portion of our citizens, to have nudity used to lower the bar of our cause and make us look vulgar and insignificant, while billions of animals are killed every year, and while PeTA is busy killing thousands themselves.

I know there are earnest hearts who work for PeTA and truly care about animals.  And there are many millions of people who believe in PeTA. But I am no longer one of them.

Related Articles:

The Classical Circular Farce of Welfarism

Sexism and Misogyny in the Movement

You Tube video regarding PeTA’s killing of animals

Overpopulation: No One is Talking

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

If we don’t halt population growth with justice and compassion, it will be done for us by nature, brutally and without pity – and will leave a ravaged world.  ~Nobel Laureate Dr. Henry W. Kendall


Recently I wrote to President Obama about two topics that I think need leadership to prevent our ultimate doom on this planet: overpopulation and veganism.  I am for the second and fear the first.  Decades ago, I was the Ventura County Coordinator for Zero Population Growth. Living in a large metropolitan area, I could see how quickly things were changing due to an ever-increasing growth of human beings.  China had instituted repressive techniques to control her population, but no other nations seemed concerned with the growth.  Science Daily calls overpopulation the world’s top environmental issue, followed by climate change.  Yet even with my ear to the ground, I rarely hear much dialogue about it. It is quietly unpopular.

It was a frustrating experience back then, and what a contentious bunch we were! I recall creating a library display in conjunction with another advocate, only to return and find my co-advocate had destroyed my half of the contribution. After an insulting meeting with a young organizer from corporate, I decided it was time to quit in disgust and use my energies in other environmental ways. I was a vegetarian back then, a fan of Friends of the Earth and living close to the land.  Later, another population growth non-profit emerged, Negative Population Growth. This seemed appropriate, since the population had grown so rapidly that Zero was hardly the answer any longer. ZPG is now renamed Population Connection. They carry on their work with some source of hope that is hard for me to fathom.

Exploding Lights

One of my vivid memories of that time was a film I kept for many years. It showed in time lapse photography the geometric growth of the human population by showing a model of Earth viewed from space, and then showing in proportional time a light for each million people. It takes quite a while before the first light shows up, than a bit before the next, but somewhere near the end of the film, the lights start going off like fireworks until the whole thing explodes. Poof! We blew it because we would not deal with controlling growth.  I remained friends with some of the ZPGers but it was always a painful group – frustrated people who were making the hard choices, not having families or severely limiting them, working to educate peoople, trying to live green and simple; basically, being totally out of step with the 80s and the growth of out of control spending and greed that followed.  The hope many of us had in the 70s, with the environmental message began to wane steeply in the materialistic 80s.  During the 70s I had lived in the Wine Country in northern California, right on the Russian River.  One friend of mine became despondent just before the 80s. He was suffering from a clinical depression, although I was not a therapist at the time and did not, sadly, recognize the signs. He had very dark (and later accurate) visions of what the future portended. He envisioned the poisoning of rivers, overpopulation, rise in greed and destruction of the peace and love of the dying hippy era.  Someone told me at work one day (I owned a small business at the foot of the mountain just off the town square) that he had set himself on fire in the park at the center of the square. He was a kind and gentle human being, a good-looking fit young man with whom I had gone on bike rides and eaten his homemade mulligatawny soup. He survived the intial burns and tragically died a couple of days later.  It was horrible to think that anyone would destroy themselves rather than take some form of action; but it is what we human beings have continued to do. Like the Earth in the film, the end was a conflagration of pain and destruction.  I hope the rest of us will take note, but it is not looking too good at this point.

Now that it is the twenty-first century, I find myself working more on that second issue that seems so critical: veganism.  It is something I can do whereas not multiplying further is a choice I have already made. Overpopulation is such an unpopular topic, but all of the energy and food demands, even the climate problems, get right back to the sudden growth, doubling of populations, straining the capacity of planet earth to support us all, to deal with our trash and waste products.  We have overfished the oceans and used her for a trash can.  Did we really think we could get away with such wanton irresponsibility for long?  Even things that do not seem to go together, often come back to this.  Why are our ship in the waters off Somalia? What are native people supposed to do when we steal their water for designer bottled water over here or steal their fish for markets in the richest countries? I would think that in countries with only 20% of the population using 80% of the world’s resources, their population above all others should be contained, as it is the most destructive.  Yet reading some population video comments online, I noted several who believed it was the third world that was out of control, not us.  They truly have no idea how many countries give up their resources to feed, water, and clothe the richer nations. It is abominable.

Too Many Animals, Too Little Habitat

Correspondingly, right alongside human overpopulation, is the overpopulation of some animal groups. Domestic cats and dogs are killed in the millions every year, despite a wealth of spay and neuter programs.  Only last week I was speaking with a classmate in my photography class at UTA, who related she just made a bunch of money by breeding her AKC dogs.  Ten more in, ten more dead at the shelters, the breed dogs valued, the mutts not so much.  And there is always one animal population or another that is supposedly “out of control,” usually because we have decimated their habitat. Our best chosen way to control them seems to be to shoot them.  I recently published an article about feral donkeys on the island of Hawaii who were getting onto the roads and causing people to fear collisions. The first comment someone made (on Veganacious fan page) was to shoot them.  Too many deer? Shoot them.  But people? Go ahead, have all the kids you want, take all the habitat you want, eat all the animals you want.  Billions of animals are killed each year, treated their entire lives as if they were mobile objects who then have to be immobilized for maximum production in minimal space.  It is an Orwellian nightmare, those factory farms.  They are so incredibly cruel and callous that I feel deep grief knowing that any of my species could participate in such horror, yet most of us do participate and passively accept it. And some of us refuse to believe that allowing human population to grow out of control is a causative factor in any of the environmental crises we have created. What hubris!

One day many years ago I received a list of animals nearing extinction that unfolded from my arms to the floor with several folds more to be shown.  Now that list would be even longer, yet the minute a species gets off the endangered list, there is a human somewhere wanting to shoot it. We human beings demonstrate so little regard for animal life, for human life, for our own planet. How did this happen? The exploitation of animals continues as does the exploitation of human beings.  While humans are not suffering the nightmare of  factory farms (except the factory workers), there are plenty of humans being trafficked, even in industrialized nations. Humans are being and always have been commodified. There was a recent chilling exhibit of human bodies that had been shipped from China, showing healthy young humans in various athletic poses, with skin removed, muscles exposed, to demonstrate the human form in action. These were actual human beings, preserved via plastination, and someone was getting quite wealthy on the money collected from the exhibit throughout the world. There were a lot of questions about where the people came from, and some evidence that they had been killed and tortured as prisoners, and their young bodies were being displayed without their prior consent. Some concerns were raised that these bodies came from a black market in human organs and  bodies.  It was a horrifying example of callous behavior that extends beyond animal flesh and into human flesh, leaving ethical questions in its wake. Everyone seems to have a price these days.

I wrote this article because I have been wondering for so long why no one is talking about overpopulation. I realized I had grown quiet, too.  It is time to talk about this important issue.  Many years ago, this country had controlled her population and things were encouraging, but we have slipped back into complacency and behaved as if there were limitless resources for us to plunder.  We have already plundered this nation and have plundered others as well. We have racked up huge debts as individuals and as a nation. We need to mature and begin living responsibly; we need to consider other peoples, other nations, other species. Changing and letting go of the past and the lifestyle to which we have become accustomed is frightening for many of us.  But change must come, for the course we are on is not sustainable.  If we grip too tightly on what we expected life to be, we might miss how much better it could become.

My Home is a Graveyard

Wednesday, August 19th, 2009

Daisies

I keep thinking I am a vegan. I respect animal life as well as human life and try to make decisions that will preserve the planet by limiting population growth, recycling, avoiding consumption of animal products, and helping to educate those around me while simultaneously, being educated by those further on the path.  I have used cloth shopping bags for a long time; I recycle, I compost. I have come to realize that due to meat-eating’s acceptance, a mountain of dead animals has created markets for every scrap of their dead bile, tissues, ligaments, bones…and those markets have made a pervasive use of these products prevalent in our society. What is truly distressing is to find out how much of my own home is a graveyard to animals.

When I was a vegetarian for many years, I had no idea that milk, cheese and eggs leave a trail of blood. One of the most upsetting aspects of using these products is learning that they kill babies – day old perfectly healthy and precious little male chicks are tossed down chutes like pieces of used tissues to their death, sometimes being ground up while still alive; newborn calves are torn from their distraught mother cows to be stored in veal crates until slaughter at a few months of age; piglets are abused in factory farms or used for lab experiments and shipped off in wooden crates like they are widgets. Luckily for me and my conscience, I never liked cow’s milk and couldn’t tolerate it; and I always thought eggs were gross. My biggest sin, or so I thought, was love of parmesan cheese, which I did keep on hand. So when I decided to go vegan, that was all I thought I needed to change – no more buying dairy parmesan.

I did make an assessment of my home – noticing the tag noted some leather in one of the chairs, and a wool coat that would need to be replaced. Because I wear a small sized shoe, I have not found replacements for all of my heels, but most of them are pleather anyway. The pair of leather sandals quickly made its way into the bag for the local mission. I found a couple of great sources for vegan soap and have found affordable vegan shampoo and even laundry soap at Whole Foods Market. Hand lotion, ditto. Makeup – do not use much. Lip balm is from a vegan vendor. Toothpaste- vegan. But contact lens solution? Dish soap? What does not have animal ingredients seems to have been tested on animals, so it is off the list as well. It takes time to be a savvy consumer; even armed with my long list of ingredients which come from animals, I occasionally make a miss, although less and less so.

DrumsBut I am a drummer. I have some vegan drums, but many of my drums were purchased long before my awakening. Even then, I questioned the animal skins and was too willing to accept that the animals were killed for meat, the skins were by-products. Now, I no longer want to “play” on the bodies of dead animals. I can replace the heads on some and will sell the others to pay for the new heads. It takes time. I do not want them in my home though. It already feels like a horror show for animal bodies. Film? It uses a chemical made from animals. Nail polish? Same answer. And all those plastics and bags- a real horror for wildlife. Beware the palm oil, coconut oil – deforestation, you know.

Okay, no meat, no cheese, no dairy…but there are dead animal parts in jelly beans, gummy bears, chocolate (some). Who really needs that junk anyway? Vegan cheese is not animal friendly either. As to chocolate, I do not want to support child slavery, so it needs to be fair-traded. Vegan labelling would be a good idea, but meanwhile I do not kvetch about researching what I buy – it is so very important to vote with my few dollars that I do so gladly. I just wish I wasn’t voting on incorrect information quite so much. And then there is the vegan cat syndrome – what is fair? What is ethical? I made the purchase of ingredients for homemade vegan cat food complete with taurine and fresh catnip, home grown. My cat would prefer to eat a dead bug. I still do not have that one figured out but have reached a compromise – my neighbors bring her scraps which she loves (they are eating more vegetarian and I do send vegan food over so it has a dual purpose). Meanwhile, she is healthy as she ages (the cat). For me, I would prefer not to have any dead animals in my home, just living ones.

TexasBluebonnetsWhen my mother died, she left behind a very costly mink coat. It was another era, but it always made me sick. So that was, as agreed by all my siblings, sent to an animal charity to try to give back to animals. But even my animal charities have changed. I used to support HSUS and PETA; I no longer support any group that supports vegetarianism rather than veganism because it shifts the suffering to the animal babies and helps people with an ethical bent feel like they are doing the right thing, when most of them would be horrified to learn the truth. I also do no support charities that practice sexism and have been rather zealous in euthanizing large numbers of animals. And I avoid charities that are constantly sending me “stuff” that I do not want – my mailbox is full of dead trees while I am trying to help the environment.  I find it difficult to support welfarists because they seem to think only some animals are worthy of assistance. Here is an example: I just received an invitation to a concert that was a fundraiser for animals – taking place at Ye Old Butcher Shoppe. I am not joking; they are serving slaughtered and barbecued animals to support “pets.” I had to write to them and voice my horror; surprisingly, I received a nice response stating they were going to do a coffee sale later on. But I do not think they got the irony. And I am sure they still think some animals are walking steaks and others have feelings and need protection. This is Texas, after all, cattle and cowboy country.  One has to be patient.

baby with skitSo here is where I am. I no long want to sit on dead animals, eat dead animals, rub their dead secretions all over my face and legs, wash in it, wear it, or play on it.  If you opened up my fridge, you would see a plethora of beautiful fresh produce, something I never thought I could afford.  And if you opened up my veins, you would find about 100 points less cholesterol.  I do not want my body or my home to be graveyards for dead animals. So I may not be all the way there yet, but I am on my journey towards becoming a better vegan.  I am sure it will be a lifelong journey, and I am grateful I am travelling this road. You meet some of the nicest creatures on this path – both animal and human.  Thanks for letting me tag along…

Sharing the Earth

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

What is man without the beasts? If all the beasts were gone, man would die from a great loneliness of spirit. For whatever happens to the beasts, soon happens to man. All things are connected.

deer

When Native Americans roamed North America, the ecology of man with plant and animal kingdoms remained in balance. Native American attitude required great respect for the earth and all of creation. There was no pillaging of earth’s resources, nor taking more than necessary for sustenance. Man was seen as part of the earth, not above it or separate from it.

When Western Man conquered the continent, the attitude was one of domination. The earth, its plants, its animals were provided for the benefit of only one species: man. In fact, the attitude was that it was for the domination of only a few men: those that were of European descent, privileged, and born in the right place at the right time. All other humans were also there to be dominated: native people, poor people, women, children. Their wants, needs, and feelings were unimportant. This allowed Western Man to be callous and self-serving.

The current decline in biodiversity, deforestation, water pollution, factory farming, overpopulation and global warming are all tied to this attitude of domination rather than respect and balance. Man has utilized death control without monitoring population control. In fact, some people believe “the more the merrier” when it comes to population, without looking at the cost for all existing life forms for the ever-increasing population numbers. Meanwhile, as Man’s numbers have swollen, the animal kingdom has continued to experience extinctions of various species at a rapidly increasing rate. Habitats have been wiped out, migration patterns have been disrupted.  Animals are being killed and tormented by the billions annually to satisfy the carnivorous appetite of some people. The natural world is in danger of becoming extinct, too.

We are a finite earth with finite resources, growing an unsustainable lifestyle, an expanding population, and increasing meat production, while multiple demands are felt for more transportation, more cars, more meat, more things. And where do we get these things? From an ever-diminishing earth whose resources are being taxed to the limit. The above words of Chief Seattle* are important to heed. We must begin to share the earth with other races, other cultures, and other species. It is time to take responsibility for the damage we have caused and try to find a better way to share the earth: with the forests, the rivers, the deserts, the mountains, with the animals, and with one another.  Our time is running out.

*While widely attributed to Chief Seattle, these words may have been based upon a letter he wrote in 1854 but were actually written by screenwriter Ted Perry in 1972 for an ecological film entitled, “Home.”

Pet Airways – a New Option for Animals

Sunday, July 26th, 2009

When I moved from California to Texas, one of the biggest stressors was trying to decide how to transport my newly acquired rescue cat.  I discussed the dilemma with people at the local pet store when I was purchasing a cat carrier. One of the salesclerks was adamant that transport via auto was preferable to flying, but the time spent in transit would have been over days, not hours. I called the airlines and was given a variety of information.  To my shock, I discovered that some people ship their animals as if they were luggage – in the noisy, climate uncontrolled baggage area beneath the main airplane cabin.  Finally, I found out that American Airlines would allow the cat to fly in the cabin with me, and that is the option I chose.  I sat in the very back of the airplane and kept my cat on my lap the entire trip. She slept and seemed very relaxed, so it was a positive experience. However, travel is very stressful for animals as well as us humans, so if it can be avoided, that would be first choice.

Now there is another option: PetAirways.   On this new airline, pets fly in carriers mounted on racks or shelving in the main cabin.  Pets are dropped off at least two hours before the flight in a Pet Lounge located at the airport.  If you need to, you may check your friend up to 72 hours before their flight.  They are given potty breaks regulary and a Pet Attendant checks the “pawsengers” every 15 minutes during the flight. The are picked up in the Pet Lounge at the receiving airport by their human guardian.


The owners of this new business credit the idea to their dog, Zoe, who was too big to fly under the seat and too much a family member to be flown as baggage. They were striving to add another option for concerned animal guardians by having a business dedicated to their safe and comfortable transport.  Current cities that are being served include: Los Angeles, Denver, Chicago, New York and Washington DC.  Prices start at $149, and appear to be competitive with major airlines. The planes are Beech 1900s, with turbo-prop engines. Here is a video to give you an idea of the service PetAirways offers.  Whatever you decide when it comes to animal transport, please do not ship your animal friends as freight.